The U.S. Constitution Is At Stake Now, And So Is World War III

TrumpSOTT.jpg

The entire escalation of this "legal assassination" of President Trump is the work of Special Counsel, and corrupt former FBI Director, Robert Mueller. Mueller has now gone far, far beyond his mandated investigation of the 2016 election, because that "Russiagate" investigation failed. His aim now is to charge the President with anything, to bring him down. Mueller merely referred the task of executing the raids against Trump attorney Michael Cohen, to the New York U.S. Attorney. That U.S. Attorney, a Trump appointee, has already been forced to recuse himself from the case — prosecution of Cohen is turned back over to Mueller, who will try to force the President's personal attorney of 25 years to turn against him.

If Donald Trump were a Saudi Prince, Robert Mueller would be protecting him. If he were CEO of Wells Fargo bank, Mueller would be negotiating a non-prosecution agreement with him. But he is President of the United States, and opposes the constant war policies of British geopoliticians.

The new attack on the President and Constitution followed his attempt, 10 days ago, to order the National Security Council and Joint Chiefs of Staff to withdraw the United States military from Syria. Mueller's attack is linked directly to the hoax of a chemical weapons attack in Syria, by the British-run "White Helmets" so-called first responders organization, who collaborate with the jihadi terrorists in Syria.

In March 2017 when President Trump said "regime change in Syria is not our mission," the staged chemical weapons attack on children in the city of Khan Sheikhoun occurred to change his mind, and the British Defense Secretary convinced Defense Secretary James Mattis to attack Syria with cruise missiles. Mattis admitted recently there was no evidence. Now when President Trump says, "We're leaving Syria, soon," the White Helmets stage another chemical attack, and Britain and France demand war on Syria.

Anyone can see this could lead — for no purpose — to a new world war, which will be unsurvivable.

 Trump's longtime lawyer Michael Cohen (center) and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Attorney General Jeff Sessions (right) Image from: Conservative Treehouse

Trump's longtime lawyer Michael Cohen (center) and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Attorney General Jeff Sessions (right) Image from: Conservative Treehouse

This is the war policy which is the aim for which the "legal assassin" Mueller has been deployed against the President and the Constitution. Congressional leaders like Senators Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell have reacted by defending Mueller's actions. Any Member of Congress who does this should be thrown out.

The LaRouche Political Action Committee is mobilizing to stop Mueller, and the war drive, with an urgent national broadside. It says, "In 2013, when Obama threatened war with Russia over Syria, the American people intervened, raised the roof of Congress, and stopped it. That is what is needed now.... Stop the drive to war and shut down Robert Mueller now."

One of those American people who intervened loudly in 2013 to stop war with Russia over Syria, was Donald J. Trump.

TrumpObamaSyria.jpg

Alan Dershowitz Critical of FBI Raid on Trump’s Attorney

April 10, 2018 (EIRNS)—Leading U.S. Constitutional lawyer and Harvard University Professor Alan Dershowitz called the FBI’s raid of the offices, hotel room, and home of President Donald Trump’s longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen in New York “a shocking and disturbing development” in The Hill today.

Dershowitz told Newsmax yesterday that he considers that raid a “very serious escalation” of the special investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election, which “should shock everybody, no matter what part of the partisan divide you’re on.” And in a Fox News interview he said, “This is a very dangerous day for lawyer-client relations.... The deafening silence from the ACLU and civil libertarians about the intrusion into lawyer-client confidentiality, is really appalling.”

President Trump himself, on his Twitter feed today, described the raid on his personal attorney’s home, office, phones and client files as “a disgraceful situation, a total witch hunt.” He called it “an attack on our country in a true sense. It’s an attack on what we all stand for.”

Dershowitz explains that a search warrant requires prosecutors to demonstrate to a judge that they have probable cause to believe that the premises they seek to search contain evidence of a crime, and must specify the area to be searched, the items to be seized, and, in searches of computers, the word searches to be used. That is the constitutional requirement in theory, especially where the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is involved, in addition to the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches. In practice, says Dershowitz, judges often give the FBI considerable latitude, relying on the “firewalls” and “taint teams” (legal advisors on the search) which they set up to conform to the Constitution. But, he points out, these teams are made up of government agents who may not be entitled to read many of the items seized. “That’s why Justice Department officials must be careful to limit the searching of lawyers’ offices to compelling cases involving serious crimes.”

Tony Blair Leads British Demands for War against Syria

April 10, 2018 (EIRNS)—Appearing on BBC, former British Prime Minister and instigator of President George W. Bush to the Iraq War, Tony Blair, called for Theresa May’s government to “back President Donald Trump” and carry out bombing and missile strikes on Syria. As Blair’s call was reported, London tabloids were confidently forecasting a “missile strike on Syria within hours.” All this when it was clear the Trump Administration had not yet decided on attacks on Syria.

Blair replied to the interviewer’s question about Parliamentary approval of a British strike, by claiming this would not be necessary “just for bombing from the air”; being challenged, he explained this only by adding “people feel there is a difference.”

The April 10 London Times lead made up an even more elaborate “alliance” cover for its call for war. “Theresa May was under pressure from ministers and allies to join a U.S.-led military strike against the Assad regime as France set the pace for retaliation against a suspected chemical attack,”

read the lead, placing the center of the drive for war everywhere except where it actually lies, in London. As for May’s “ministers,” one of them, Foreign Minister Boris Johnson, was definitely recommending British strikes on Syria. Johnson reportedly called U.S. Acting Secretary of State John J. Sullivan April 10 to brief him on the need for war.

The Times went further to disguise its war-cry: “As Britain prepared options including the use of Tomahawk missiles, senior figures warned that it risked losing influence in Washington to France if it turned down a request by President Trump to join a retaliatory strike.”