"So if our own country should ever fall into totalitarianism, the Department of Justice would be one of the first failures, wouldn’t it?"
-- Co-Hosts journalist William Bradford Huie, and U.S. diplomat James H.R. Cromwell, interview of NY Congressman Kenneth B. Keating, chairman of the judiciary subcommittee that was investigating the Department of Justice. ("Longines" television program, June 20, 1952)
This morning I'm watching the aftermath of the sudden firing of FBI Director James Comey. Some see this move by the President as a barrelful of sewage that just got drained from the swamp. Others are not so sure; we've been tricked before by the White House. Our suspicions will be confirmed soon enough when we see whatever Pinocchio next fills the J. Edgar chair.
The reference to the fabled puppet is not made lightly. Below are links to two recent documentaries by John Titus that present the fact that the entire justice system in the United States is a captured operation, and has been, for a long time. Titus's arguments focus on the 2008 meltdown. And no, this is not just another whiny rant about how banksters never get sent to jail and when-oh-when is anybody ever going to do something about it. Listen, sister, 10 years have passed and that ain't never going to happen. The point of his argument is, sadly, that the Babylonian Priesthood [my words] are the true sovereigns of this country. Their continual immunity from prosecution is evidence of their implied right to rule. Therefore, any application by the Sheeple to the Justice System for a redress of financial grievances is doomed to fall on deaf ears because the Priesthood created the law and therefore sits above it.
I know that many will be angered by those words and will run around waving a copy of the Constitution, yelling, "But what about this? We still have rights!" All I can say is, "Welcome to the Matrix." The system that we live under was carefully constructed by European Money Men and Secret Society initiates who skillfully used beneficent, wise, somber-looking Founding Fathers as their tools and front men. Here we sit, in the year 2017, watching this nearly 250-year-old experiment running its course. You can debate that point all you want in the Comments section at the end of this page. My first line of rebuttal to your argument will be this: "Whose money did the pilgrims have jangling in their pockets when they arrived on the Mayflower?"
While John Titus's films only look at this issue from the point of view of the Goldman Sachs/JP Morgan coup d'etat in 2008, I would remind you that evidence of the Priesthood's immunity from prosecution goes far beyond financial fraud. I recently posted a summary of the interview with Dutch ex-banker Ronald Bernard [linked here]. He has knowledge of perpetrators of continual child sacrifice rituals, even being asked to participate in such a heinous abomination (which is itself a crime), and yet, has he called up his local law enforcement to get those people arrested? Nope, nor will he. Not ever. They have trained him not to do that. Bernard knows that those people sit above prosecution.
Think carefully on all that was implied in Ronald Bernard's interview. Upwards of 8500 people sit "at the top of the pyramid" who routinely slit the throats of children as part of their protocol in running the world's financial system, and they do so without any fear of arrest and execution. Do you really think a system run by that quality of psychopathy would hesitate for one second from heaping piles of financial fraud on top of each other? Do you really think there is any checkerboard square of your daily life that they have not cornered?
I never tire of reminding people of David Rothkopf's words, "Sovereignty only goes so far." His way of proving who your real sovereigns are was by reminding us that the US Gov came begging to Wall Street, asking them to come up with a way to halt the 2008 meltdown, not the other way around. By the way, in the photo below, an image of Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein wearing crowns on their heads, appeared in an article by Business Insider six years ago, in a brief report about how Russian President Medvedev was holding meetings with Wall Street kings to seek out ways to transfer Russia's sovereignty to the Priesthood. Now isn't it just a little too funny that nobody was accusing Dimon and Blankfein of sleeping with the Russians, back then? Apparently, American Presidents can meddle with "the Russians" only when specifically authorized to do so by the Priesthood. Remember, for the last two months, Goldman Sachs has been running President Trump's national security council.
"We believe it is very important to participate in the committees advising President Medvedev on how to transform Moscow into a financial center,” said Dimitri Agishev, a Deutsche Bank spokesman, in an e-mailed statement. Russia continues to be a key market with ample opportunities." -- Katya Wachtel, BusinessInsider.com, Mar 11, 2011
Closed Door Coup
Here is John Titus's previous video, "The Veneer of Justice in a Kingdom of Crime". Near the end of the presentation [transcribed here], he makes this point:
"So who are America’s real sovereigns or criminal kings? An unremitting campaign of lies and deception by the Justice Department kept this a secret for too many years, but no more.... Collateral consequences, unlike some other meeting topic, explains the DOJ’s implication that the law could change so as to indict Goldman Sachs. That outcome runs roughshod over the constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws and is a fair indication that it wasn’t in force. There are two ways that could have been the case. One way would have been to amend the Constitution by convention or vote to allow ex post facto laws. But there was no amendment, which leaves the second way, and that would have been an overthrow of the Constitution by coup d’état. In a coup d’état, a person or group intent on seizing power commits criminal acts to overthrow the legitimate sovereign.
While many overthrows take place out in the open and there’s no doubt in anyone’s mind about what’s happened, a coup is much easier to pull off behind closed doors. The mark of a coup isn’t the openness of defiance. That actually has nothing to do with it. The sign of a coup is the illegality of acts by those in close proximity to sovereign power and their false claims about sovereign authority.
The DOJ statement that 'the law at this time' doesn’t support Goldman’s indictment reflects the so-called law under mortal human power. American constitutional law, by contrast, doesn’t hinge on a heartbeat and the qualifier is totally out of place. The DOJ’s exoneration is far from the only tell that in America the rule of law is dead. The DOJ has countless admissions that “collateral consequences” immunizes global banks but no one else puts the matter beyond dispute."
All the Plenary's Men
Titus recently released his sequel video, entitled "All The Plenary's Men." In the very middle of the video, Titus explains how that weapon of mass destruction, the FSB, works. That's the "Financial Stability Board" located in, where else? Basel, Switzerland -- the very heart and soul of the dark financial western empire for the last thousand years. At the 27-minute mark, Titus shows that U.S. cabinet officials answer to Goldman Sachs at the FSB, not the other way around!
"By having cabinet level officials answer to former Goldman Sachs executives and their friends, in secret meetings, the FSB provides perfect cover for the criminal banking cartel to control western governments under the amorphous heading of 'financial stability.'"
In conclusion, I hope the reader is left, not with a sense of hopelessness, but with a dose of reality. The enemy can't be fought unless you know what it is and what its capabilities are. Many people clamor, day after day, for "justice to be enforced" or this-or-that politician to be elected, as if democracy can touch a Priesthood who invented and installed democracy over you as their own personal power tool. Even poor Ronald Bernard and his "BofJoy" initiative feel that they can bring hope to humanity by reforming the system from the bottom up.
The reality is that a coup has already taken place. The fact that we all sit here allowing the Babylonian Priesthood to remain on our throne implies that we have accepted its sovereignty. Let me repeat that: your allowance of the king to sit on that throne implies that you have accepted him as your king.
For myself, I see no evidence that a system that sits in power over you can "be reformed." It seems to me that it simply needs to be removed. Which begs the questions: "How do you remove an entity who has more firepower than you do?" and "Once removed, how do you keep it from reappearing?"