CNN Admits Putin Didn't Exactly Endorse Trump, 'Ex' NSA Spooks, UK Guardian and Atlantic Council Propagandists Insist Russia is Weaponizing EVERYTHING Against the West

After aggressively pushing the talking point for months that the Russian President Vladimir V. Putin endorsed Donald J. Trump for President of the United States -- and in fairness, with The Donald embracing words of praise from Putin in campaign speeches -- the mainstream media led by CNN has been forced to backtrack over the weekend. Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) to CNN pundit Fareed Zakaria, Putin clarified his remarks and accused (post)Western media of mis-translating or distorting his earlier statements.

Once again the Russian leader emphasized that Americans would choose their next President, while also pointing out that the U.S. Electoral College system makes it possible for the choice of a majority of American voters to not actually win:

What I Actually Said: 
Putin Takes CNN's Fareed Zakaria to Task for Words "Lost in Translation"

Interestingly enough, while (post)Western media including the neocon Daily Beast and former NATO spokesmen like Ben Nimmo have accused Russia and Russian media of massively promoting the UK's Brexit from the European Union, Putin actually questioned the timing and agenda of Prime Minister David Cameron in Thursday's referendum, calling the UK vote 'blackmail' of the EU. After making these negative remarks about Cameron, Putin then refrained from saying pro-or-con exactly how he would vote on the subject if he were British. Here's the Iranian-state funded network Press TV's translation of Putin's rather complicated view of Brexit, which is definitely not that of frequent RT guest and UKIP leader Nigel Farage:

A hacker named Guccifer 2.0 has released documents that show collaboration between the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. John Iadarola (ThinkTank), Jayar Jackson, and Elliot Hill (The Lip TV), hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

Russia is Weaponizing EVERYTHING: Hackers, ISIS Wannabe Script Kiddies, Soccer Hooligans, and the Immivasion of Europe from NATO Member Turkey

It remains to be seen if more voices in mainstream media will challenge the Democratic National Committee and the Atlantic Council (NATO think tank)-linked cyber security executive Dmitri Alperovitch of CrowdStrike to produce proof from their tracing of the 'hack'. Both the DNC and Alperovitch insist that the Democrats' servers were hacked by state-sponsored Russian cyber criminals linked to Moscow's security services. Donald Trump disputed Alperovitch's and the DNC's claims, suggesting that the DNC 'hacked themselves' to distract from Hillary's ongoing classified email scandal (and The Donald didn't have to add, the Obama Justice Department's efforts to cover it up on her campaign's behalf). 

When it comes to media, few have joined Adam Johnson of leftist leaning website and a few cybersecurity specialists in questioning the attribution of the hack as well as the suspicious timing of announcing it, weeks after Trump all but locked up the GOP nomination and Hillary Clinton's surrogates turned their primary focus of attack onto The Donald. The Russia Analyst is certainly among the skeptics asking: if the DNC knew that its oppo research file on Mr. Trump had been stolen weeks ago, why did it wait for the conclusion of the GOP primary contest to announce this fact? For his part, Mr. Johnson had this to say:

Alperovitch, as the Post notes, also works for the Atlantic Council—a reliably anti-Putin think tank that publishes articles such as “Two Cheers for Cold War!” and policy papers like “Distract Deceive Destroy: Putin at War in Syria” and Hiding in Plain Sight: Putin’s War in Ukraine.” The Atlantic Council is funded by the US State Department, other NATO governments (Norway, Sweden, Finland, NATO itself) and a consortium of Western corporations (Qualcomm, Coca-Cola, The Blackstone Group), including weapons manufacturers (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman) and oil companies (ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP).
The OffGuardian website shows why the MSMNarrative about Russia/Syria is breaking down

The OffGuardian website shows why the MSMNarrative about Russia/Syria is breaking down

Meanwhile, in the category of 'Russia is weaponizing everything' propaganda, the UK Guardian, once a respectable if leftist broadsheet, is now simply parroting British Ministry of Defense (Whitehall) talking points that the Russians hooligans who beat up English hooligans after the Euro2016 soccer match a week ago n Marseilles were members of Moscow's military or special services. Never mind how many of the Russian hooligans have long hair and tattoos distinctly uncharacteristic of Russia's soldiers or FSB agents, who needs any fact checking of whatever some single source in Whitehall says -- as Irish journalist Bryan Macdonald points out at, the Guardian just goes with it. The fact that the Guardian turned from a leftist outlet skeptical of those in power during the 2003 Iraq invasion to a hardcore pro-NATO and anti-Russia sheet, Macdonald suggests, may have something to do with its collapsing print circulation over the last decade.

ISIS Isn't 'USUS' or At Least Turkey/GCC-IS, ISIS = Crazy Ivan

Elsewhere Der Spiegel, perhaps to atone for its previous skepticism regarding previous NATO talking points or Atlantic Council sponsored Bellingcat BS flung at the Russians, is reporting that Germany's BND, NSA and France's DGSE have all concluded an ISIS 'CyberCaliphate' group is actually run by the Russian security services. John R. Schindler, the ex-NSA counterintelligence analyst turned in house Ft. Meade historian turned forced to resign Naval War College professor we've previously profiled here at RogueMoney, has the 'scoop':

...the Cyber Caliphate is a Russian false-flag operation. Although that loaded term has been hijacked by tinfoil-hat wearers and fringe websites, including lunatics who think horrific school shootings didn’t actually happen, it’s a perfectly legitimate espionage method of venerable vintage. Spy agencies routinely pose as third parties for operational purposes such as agent recruitment and covert action. The nastier intelligence services will even masquerade as terrorists to further their agenda.

Nobody is more adept at this dodgy practice than the Russians, who have been using false-flags in their spy work for more than a century. Indeed, for the Kremlin, this commonplace practice constitutes a key element of what they term provocation (provokatsiya in Russian), meaning the use of spies and their agents to cause secret political effects that are helpful to Moscow and hurtful to Moscow’s enemies.

The idea that Vladimir Putin authorized his intelligence agencies to go to cyber war against the West under an ISIS cloak is anything but shocking to anybody informed about longstanding Russian espionage tradecraft, what they tellingly refer to as konspiratsiya (yes, “conspiracy”). The only innovation here is the online aspect. Everything else reflects a century of “lessons learned” in Kremlin spy work. These are the sorts of clandestine things Putin was trained in and actually did as a KGB officer. And “there are no ‘former’ intelligence officers,” as the Russian president has stated.
Sub for more: | Eric Zuesse for the Daily Sheeple reports On Tuesday, June 14th, NATO announced that if a NATO member country becomes the victim of a cyber attack by persons in a non-NATO country such as Russia or China, then NATO's Article V "collective defense" provision requires each NATO member country to join that NATO member country if it decides to strike back against the attacking country.
The CyberCaliphate -- apparently another RooskiePlot

The CyberCaliphate -- apparently another RooskiePlot

Sub for more: | Tony Cartalucci for Lew Rockwell reports It is now confirmed that in addition to two investigations and two interviews, Florida terror suspect Omar Mateen was also approached by "informants" working for the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over a period of 10 months.

It would appear the alternative media and specifically John B. Wells of Caravan to Midnight's catchy phrase 'ISIS is USis' is getting under the trans-Atlantic spooks' skin, as is the all too frequent use of the term 'false flag' online. Hence the sudden urgency of getting out the 'ISIS is Ivan' messaging.

Apparently the State Department's open hosting of Al-Qaeda allied Ahrar al Sham spokesmen and the neocon Daily Beast citing anonymous Al-CIA-eda backers at Langley grousing about the Pentagon not sharing their enthusiasm for arming Syrian Al-Qaeda plus the Secretary of State asking the Russians NOT to bomb Al-Nusra have taken their toll on Washington's credibility in the endless 'war on terror'. So too have 21stCenturyWire's revelations this past week that the Orlando shooter's alleged CIA asset Afghan-born father had a program on a California-based Dari-language satellite channel and knew many influential politicians, including Ed Royce (R-California) the Chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee.

Throwing Whatever They Can at the Wall and Seeing What Sticks: #BlameRussia and #BlamePutin for the Refugee Crisis U.S. and NATO Allied GCC Jihadis Created

It would also seem that the Langley/MI6 crowd is angry that Russia's awesome 'propaganda machine' has exploited the immivasion crisis in Europe that NATO thus far has been doing nothing about, while blaming the Russians rather than hordes of Saudi and Turkish backed Salafist fanatics for forcing millions of Syrians to flee their country. Desperate to distract Europeans from the fact that it's the government of a NATO member state and U.S. ally against Assad Turkey which is blackmailing the EU for billions or else the migrant hordes will be unleashed, the Atlantic Council is drawing on its Scandinavian propagandists to insist Russia is actually the country threatening Europe with millions of 'refugees'.

The Atlantic Council mouthpiece Veli-Pekka Kivimaki of Bellingcat pushes this talking point even though the number of Syrians passing through northern Russia en route to the Eurasian country's borders with Finland and Norway is minuscule compared to the hundreds of thousands flowing through the Aegean and Mediterranean seas. That is, in the waters around southern Europe where NATO navies could have easily interdicted the refugee boats from Turkey or North Africa in support of the over-stretched Greek and Italian coast guards, but refused to intervene as late as February 2016. In response to the widely publicized but half-assed NATO mission implemented since then that will supposedly deter human smugglers operating off the Turkish coast, Foreign Affairs had this to say:

NATO’s response to the migrant crisis has been met with criticism on both humanitarian and utilitarian grounds. The first critique is that military efforts to slow or reverse the refugee flow will lead to unnecessary human suffering. The second critique is that NATO’s operation will do little or nothing to deter people-smuggling, and may even encourage more of it. In fact, the operation’s humanitarian impact is unlikely to be as dire as skeptics predict. Doubts about NATO’s ability to stem illegal migration, however, will linger for some time—unless the alliance significantly expands the scope of its new mission.

Conclusion: Watch Out for Evil Russian Hackers and 'Hybrid War' Ops Everywhere

At this point, we expect the hysterical bullshit regarding anything and everything the Russians allegedly did right up to making your neighbor stub his toe when he walks out for the morning paper to fly fast and furious in the next several weeks. Especially if the pro-Brexit side wins Thursday's referendum ahead of the early July NATO summit in Warsaw, Poland.

A pro-Islamic State hacking group known as the Cyber Caliphate, has been propping up the terrorists' offensive online. It's known for hacking into US state department files, and releasing hit-lists of thousands of Westerners. But German media reports now suggest the group doesn't actually work for ISIS at all.